Friday, March 11, 2016

Global Push To Achieve SDGs Vision and Words with Action Agenda 17

ISPE       EAG
INTERATIONAL SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION                   ECONOMIC ALLIANCE GROUP

Focused Points for ING Meeting Organizers and Participants Consideration and Appropriate ACTION – Part 3

Summary

We at NEHAP / ISPE / EAG commend all on UN Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides working towards Design and Delivery of Global Goals – revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome and Agenda 21; Aligned and Harmonized with revised National Development Plans, NDPs that can achieve Vision Ambitions by 2030. Giant Strides have been made but much more remains to be done. The starting point is recognition by Governments, Stakeholders and UN Family Organization that What questions have been over-answered and that How questions need to be more Professionally tackled and in ways that bring Whole of World Thinking to Bear towards the Sustainable Solutions to Whole of World problems. To achieve this IGN Meetings need to better address the following Focused Points set out in this Supporting Papers Series. In Part 3:-
1.     Focus on correct answers to How To(s)
There is a need for Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides to recognize that they have agreed on the “what” in regard to partnership and share common interests and goals, yet the details on “how” still need to be developed, that many UN Events scheduled specifically to find correct answers to these “how” questions end up finding answer to “what” questions. To achieve this there has to be a Focus on correct answers to How To(s) and in ways that help achieve increasing convergence between Theory and Practice and Global / National Vision Intention and Reality.

2.     Focus on Understanding
There is a need for Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides to recognize that: you can’t defeat real enemy you don’t understand; you can’t solve root problems you don’t understand and you can’t answer big questions you don’t understand. To have these required levels of understanding, Stakeholders on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides need to consider facing new direction and adopting new priorities and on time.

 In Part 1, we discussed:-

  1. Revolution 2030
Design and Delivery of Global Goals and National Goals – revised AAAA, SDG, COP 21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc aligned and harmonized with NDPs’ that will be successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design and Delivery of Revolution 2030, a set of Interlinked, Interconnected and Interdependent Primary Revolutions: Water, Agriculture, Enterprise, Government, Applied Research, Attitudinal and Behavioral Change, Data, Digital and other Primary Revolution as Health, Education, Nutrition, Justice, Anti Corruption, Security, Peace and other Secondary Revolution Driving all Global Goals Aligned and Harmonized to NDPs in each UN Member State.

  1. MSP 2030
Design and Delivery of Revolution 2030 that will be successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design and Delivery of a Master Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP for all Global Goals Aligned and Harmonized to NDPs in each UN Member State and MSPs’ for each Action Agenda Item within revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome etc Aligned and Harmonized with NDPs’ in each UN Member State.

In Part 2, we discussed:-

1.     Capacity 2030
Design and Delivery of Revolution 2030 and Solidarity 2030 that will be successful on sustainable basis greatly depends of finding correct answers to How questions, fully implement these answers and effectively monitor and evaluate this implementation greatly depends on Design and Delivery of Capacity 2030 to address Individual Capacity issues of Demand and Supply of Hard Competences: Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies: Character, Courage and Mindset; Institution Capacity Issues and Society Capacity Issues from Village to Global levels.

2.     Revolution 2030
Design and Delivery of Revolution 2030, Solidarity 2030 and Capacity 2030 that will be successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design and Delivery of Solidarity 2030; Village to Global Solidarity Mechanism that help bridge Gap between Political Leadership we need and Political Leadership we have from Village to Global levels.

Introduction

This Part 3 complements points made in Part 1 and Part 2 in this IGN Meetings Supporting Papers Series. If practical answers are to be found to How questions and in ways that help achieve all Goals and Targets in revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc aligned and harmonized with National Development Plans, NDPs’ in each UN Member State, Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States, UN System and MGoS sides need to take ownership of ideas and suggestions harvested from Global Consultations and RUN with them in the Common Interest and Common Future of all Humanity, particularly the over 2 Billion Poor in both Developed and Developed Countries that they are serving.

The Argument

We observe that Policy Makers, Decision Makers, Managers and Officers are working HARDer doing the same old things in the same old ways and wondering why they are not getting new Results.

Our Study finding is that real and complex National and International Development Cooperation problems on the ground from Village to Global levels can be especially difficult but not impossible to solve on successful and sustainable basis; that there is more than enough resources – Influence, Technology, Innovation, Science, Arts, Manpower, Money, Land, Water and Spiritual to solve Political & Cultural; Economic & Financial; Social & Environmental; Religious & Moral; Peace & Security problems on the ground in each specific location – Village to Global in each of the over 300 UN Member States in our World today.

Our argument is that should Policy Makers, Decision Makers, Managers and Officers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides START working SMARTer doing new things in new ways, the much expected new Results will be obtained, even if many Stakeholders have to DO more with same. However, should Stakeholders continue with Business as Usual, the ultimate consequences could be catastrophic for all Citizens in each Country in our fragile planet.

Urgent Need for Review

Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS parrot Business Unusual and Change but practice Business and Usual and Anti Change. This is a major reason why UN Events set up specifically to find answers to “how” questions which is about “DOING” always end up finding answers to “what” questions which is about “SAYING”.

There are many reasons for this unfortunate state of affairs, including Competence, Attitudinal and Behavioural etc. Should Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides genuinely desire to achieve Global Goals – revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National Development Plans in each of the over 300 UN Member States and on schedule dates, there is urgent need to review existing structure of ING Meetings, Global Consultations and National Consultation to better support discussing and establishing all necessary negotiations and arrangements for achieving increasing convergence between National / Global Vision Intention and Reality and on schedule dates.

One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach

Answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Data Revolution, Synthesis Report where questions (including what and why questions) and How questions at Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global levels need to be found through:-
1.     Orientation Workshops
2.     Management Surveys
3.     Financial Surveys
4.     Engineering Surveys
5.     Desk Analysis of Reports – Conference and Study
for Headquarters Management and each Strategic Business Unit in each UN Member State, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS Entity, processed into Community, Country, Regional and Global Master Plans with ACTION setting out Priorities, Direction, Sequence and Pace of Action Agenda Items in revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc aligned and harmonized with NDPs’ required to achieve National and Global Goals and Targets in all its ramifications as specific to each Constituency at Local, Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global levels:-
1.     Planning Side – Research, Planning and Data
2.     Implementation Side – Implementation
3.     Evaluation Side – Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment
4.     Learning Side – Learning and Results
5.  Accountability Side – Transparency, Accountability and Citizen and Stakeholder Participation.
within One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach to Sustainable National and International Development Cooperation.
  
Front End / Back End



Where the above Workshops and Surveys present Front End of Reforms, the following Initiatives will be the Back End and where these Initiatives present Front End the Workshops and Surveys will be Back End:-
1.     One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach with Local Context
2.     Consultative Research Management
3.     Development Research Management
4.     Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management
5.  Policy, Program, Project Intervention and Policy, Program, Project Intervention Training as One
6.     Re-establish existing Institutions / Ventures
7.     Establish new Institutions / Ventures
8.  Communication for UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome, SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Synthesis Report etc Management
9.     Country Led Evaluation System Management
10.  Standards Management
11. Sanctions Management
12. Celebration Management

One Worldwide Approach is not One Cap fits All; but a way of getting Village to Global Stakeholders to stop working in “silos” and start working in “teams”; to stop using “multiple approaches” some of which are divergent and start using “generic approach” adapted to meet unique and specific need of particular location or circumstance. One Worldwide Approach that would be adopted by Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS will be a Known Approach with clear Principles, Instruments corresponding to each Principle, Practices and Database. The only such Worldwide Common and Systemic Approach / One Worldwide Approach available in our World today, that meets criteria for One Worldwide Approach Recommended in SG Synthesis Report December 2014 is 3PCM  (Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits Focused National and International Development Cooperation). Please let us know if you are aware of any other One Worldwide Approach that meet this Standard.

Clear Statements

1.     NEHAP/ ISPE / EAG have no power or intention to force any individual, institution or government to accept its international development cooperation solutions.
2.    No one individual, institution or government anywhere in our world today has all the answers to all of UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, etc How questions
3.     Correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome etc How questions cannot be found in Desk Work - conferences, consultations and research driven by talking and thinking.
4.     Correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How questions can only be found in Desk Work - conferences, consultations and research and Field Work – theory, practice and partnership driven by action and accomplishment that is inclusive and effectively connect each community in each of 193 Member States to UN Headquarters New York.
5.  Current AAAA, SDG, COP21 processes each has flaws and failures arising from technical errors and mistaken priorities from village to global levels that need to be immediately corrected.
6.   Current Attitude and Behaviour of most Village to Global Stakeholders on both State Actors and Non State Actors fall below minimum certain levels required to find correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How questions, full implement these answers with effective monitoring and evaluation of this implementation in ways that achieve Global Goals by 2030 target date.
7.   Current effort at answering UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How questions is at least one year behind. Renewed effort is required if lost ground is to be covered and if each community in each of 193 Member States is to accelerate on path to achieving Global Goals by 2030 Target date.
8.  Each day Decision Makers in each UN Family Organization Entity, 193 Member States and concerned Non State Actors sides delay or deny adopting or adapting existing sound answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome etc How questions is one day too long. Allowed to continue, the ultimate consequences for our fragile planet could be catastrophic.

Integrated Architecture – Village to Global

There is a need for Integrated Architecture Village to Global that includes:-
1.  Inclusive MSP: Master MSP and MSPs within – Global Goals, National Goals, Planning and Implementation, Follow Up and Review, Access to Justice, Peace and Security, Corruption, Counter Terrorism and Counter Insurgence, Cooperatives, Finance for Development, Technology for Development, Development Research and 17 SDGs’.
2.     Inclusive P4CSD: Policy Collaboration, Cooperation, Coordination and Cohesion for Sustainable Development
3. Inclusive EAT4SD: Education and Training for Sustainable Development – 5 Linkages: EAT4SD Theoretical and Practical Instruction; EAT4SD and Industry; EAT4SD at Different Levels – Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Vocational, Professional; EAT4SD at different Types of Institutions – Government, Private, NGO, Parochial, other’ EAT4SD and Extension – Government, Private, Pluralistic.
4.  Inclusive CAB4SD: Capacity Building for Sustainable Development – 3 Levels: Individual – Hard Competences: Learning and Skills and Soft Competences: Character, Courage and Mindset; Institution – Pro Poor Institution Reform Processes and Pro Poor Economic Growth Processes that Support Individuals practicing their Hard and Soft Competences in their Day to Day work and in ways that help achieve Corporate Goals and Vision and Society – Political & Cultural, Economic & Financial, Social & Environmental, Religious & Moral, Peace & Security Space for Institutions to Thrive on Chaos.
5.   3PI and 3PI Training as One: Policy, Program, Project Intervention, 3PI and 3PI Training as One in each Action Agenda Item in AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National development Plans in over 300 UN Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides.
6.     Integrated Master Plans: Village to Global
7.     Internal and External Consultants Support System: Village to Global
8.     Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management System: Village to Global
9.     One Worldwide Approach to (1) – (8).

Acid Test of Credibility

The acid test of credibility of SDG, AAAA, Agenda 21, COP21 etc is how each delivers:-
1.     Better Domestic and International Trade in each of 193 Member States.
2.     Better Financing – Equity, Loan and Grant for all particularly the Poor
3.     Better War on Corruption and Terrorism and
4.     Better Environmental Sustainability.
                                           
New Thinking, New Ideas, New Ways of Doing Things etc

The only way World Leaders can deliver on their promise during the adoption of SDG is to improve Cohesion, Coordination, Collaboration, Cooperation, Solidarity and Accountability in the design and delivery of mutual support mechanism that help each of the 193 Member States to pass this acid test of credibility of the SDGs.

To achieve this, the 193 (over 300) Member States jointly and severally must demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate:-
1.   Willingness to accept new ideas, new thinking, new ways of doing things
2.  Willingness to establish new coordination, new collaboration, new cooperation, new solidarity, new accountability and new partnership
3.   Readiness to accept past flaws, past failures, past drawbacks, past shortcomings and past hindrances
4.   Readiness to build bridge between lessons learning and lessons forgetting, create learning organization and create learning society
5.    Readiness to create Demand for Planning – Research, Planning, Data as basis for creating Supply for Planning – Research, Planning, Data
6.   Readiness to create Demand for Implementation as basis for creating supply for Implementation
7.     Readiness to create Demand for Evaluation – Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment as basis for creating Supply for Evaluation – Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment
8.   Readiness to create Demand for Accountability – Transparency, Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder Participation as basis for creating Supply for Accountability – Transparency, Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder Participation
9.  Readiness to create Demand for Learning – Learning and Result as basis for creating Supply for Learning – Learning and Result
10. Readiness to accept One Nationwide / Region wide / Worldwide 3PCM – Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach and Methodology to Sustainable Benefits focused National and International Development Cooperation Policy, Program, Project Intervention, 3PI and 3PI Training as One in each Action Agenda Item in each of the 17 SDGs applicable to specific context – Village to Global in each of the 193 (over 300) Member States


Working Together To Benefit Together

 ][[[[[[[[]]]]]]












To help ensure World Leaders deliver on promise to achieve SDGs’ by 2030, we suggest relevant UN and Non UN authorities undertake critical review of this and earlier Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles. Should its assessment confirm that indeed the Papers, Policy Briefings and articles have many good ideas and pertinent suggestions, which adopted by UNGA, HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council, 193 Member States Governments and Partners – Village to Global can help achieve increasing convergence between AAAA and SDG Vision and Words with Action Intention and Reality in each Community in each Local Government in each of 193 Member States, we suggest these UN and Non UN authorities consider taking the following specific action steps:-
1. Endorse the Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles and request UNDESA or UNNGLS to circulate the endorsed Papers, Policy Briefings and articles to all World Leaders, 193 (over 300) Member States and other AAAA and SDG Stakeholders.
2.     Underline need for Integrated Sustainable Solutions – Political Solutions, Cultural Solutions, Economic Solutions, Financial Solutions, Social Solutions, Environment Solutions, Peace Solutions, Security Solutions, Religious Solutions and Moral Solutions; to Design and Delivery of each Action Agenda Item in AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc applicable to specific Village to Global location context.
3.   Urge all World Leaders, 193 (over 300) member States and other AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document etc Stakeholders to recognize that Political Solutions is Master Key to unlocking remaining 9 Integrated Sustainable Solutions.
4.  Urge UNGA, HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council to  each pass resolution calling on each of the 193 (over 300) Member States to adopt recommendations in the Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles and go further to establish immediately National Integrated Economic Reform Program, NIEReP for the implementation and evaluation of domesticated AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document etc Vision and Words with Action, aligned with National Development Plan through National Reform Bureau working with Reform Implementation Unit in each Ministry, Department and Agency in each of the 193 (over 300) Member States, whose activities are coordinated by Steering Committee on Reform and National Council on Reform within complimentary Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global Master Multi Stakeholder Partnership Platforms.

If SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document etc Vision Ambitions are to be achieved and on schedule date, Village to Global Stakeholders need to Work Together to Benefit Together.

2nd Global Consultation on SG Report on Follow Up and Review

The PGA has requested a second Global Consultation on SG Report on Follow Up and Review to fill gaps in the Report. It will be recalled that this SG Report intended to help answer How question but ended up answering What questions. Our Organization is to the best of our knowledge the only Organization that openly raised its Voice to draw attention to the fact that this SG Report answered What questions and not How questions. It is our hope that this time the revised SG Report will actually answer How questions. Can this be done without addressing all fundamental issues raised in this and other Papers released by our Organization?

The UN Retreat on MSP Outcome Document identifies the need for UN Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF to answer How questions but did not make recommendations as to ways and means of moving forward in this regard. Can MSP How questions be answered without this being integral part of answer to revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National Development Plans in over 300 UN Member States How questions? Again can these be done without addressing all fundamental issues raised in this and other Papers released by our Organization?

MOVING FORWARD

Do World Leaders, UNDESA, EOSG, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and Partners recognize that correct answer to all AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc How questions lie in the DOING? That without immediately:-
1.  Appointing Reform Adviser and Global Coordinating Consultant on AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document etc Policy Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable Development, P4CSD to UNGA, ECOSOC, UN Security Council and HLPF and Partners
2.     Selecting One Worldwide Approach without further delay
3.   Establishing Mater Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP and MSPs for each Action Agenda item Village to Global, VtG
4.  Establishing Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of Practice on Poverty Elimination and Environmental Sustainability as VtG Platform for all relevant existing and new Disciplines
5.    Addressing issues of Trust, Silos, Honesty, Thinking, Solidarity, Attitude, Behaviour, Communication etc VtG
6.    Connecting each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 (over 300) Member States to UN Headquarters New York
7.  Establishing VtG Mechanism for Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management
8.     Establishing VtG Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One
9.     Establishing VtG Mechanism for Ownership, Harmony, Alignment, Accountability, Transparency, Transformation, Leadership, Learning, Results and Participation (Citizens and Stakeholders), OH2A2T2LRP
10. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Policy Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable Development, P4CSD
11. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Master Collaborative Research Support Program, CRSP for each Action Agenda Item

It will be uphill task achieving increasing convergence between UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty etc Vision Intention and Reality. If these Visions are not achieved by 2030 Target date, the ultimate consequences for our Fragile Planet could be catastrophic. 

About ISPE / EAG

Lanre and colleagues have for over twenty years made great sacrifices, demonstrated uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in continuing constructive engagement of relevant sub-national, national and international stakeholders, to jointly focus on comprehensive systemic solutions to our real and complex national political, economic, social, security, cultural and religious problems on the ground.

International Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of Economic Alliance Group, EAG. Some other EAG Members include:-
1.     AR & Associates Limited, Strategy and Development Cooperation Consulting Firm – Research, Planning, Statistics, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment, Learning, Results, Advocacy.
2.     EAG - CLEAR, Centre for Learning in Evaluation and Results, Evaluation Organization
3.     EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy Management, Research Organization
4.     EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.     EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School / Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.     EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization

EAG is neutral in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International Development Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries Governments; Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions / International Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to Global; Media – National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global Collective ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on schedule dates.
The core business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of Complex National or International or both National and International Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement.

AR has been in business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been in business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR; EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS; EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.

EAG has in the past 25 years spent over US$3 Million (N1.2 Billion) to Develop the 3PCM Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N6 Billion) Free of Charge. This is Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by Service to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us Work Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we Configure our World.

Conclusion

In this Paper and earlier Papers we have raised serious issues of serious business that deserve the serious attention of World Leaders, 193 (over 300) Member States, UN Family Organization and Partners from Village to Global levels. Each day delay in addressing these fundamental issues is one day too long.

Our World has enough Resources to meet the needs of its over 7 Billion People. Our World does not have enough Resources to meet the GREED of over 7 Billion People. However, these Resources remain unlocked potential if there is no new thinking, new ideas and new ways of doing things and if Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States, UN Family Organization and MGoS sides do not individually and collectively accept Village to Global Solidarity is essentially for finding sustainable solutions to real and complex World problems on the ground from Village to Global levels.

We strongly urge concerned authorities in the UN System, 193 (over 300) Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides to individually and jointly recognize that without facing new direction and adopting new priorities; without adopting Business Unusual doing new things in new ways, the expected new Results will remain Mirage.

We urge World Leaders, UN Family Organization Executives and MGoS Executives to consider stopping ongoing search for Sustainable Solutions that exist.

Contact:
Director General
International Society for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade Avenue,
Ijapo Estate, Akure,  Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805

Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk                                                             11 March 2016.